|04-26-2012, 09:54 PM||#1|
RotorMan to the Rescue!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mazda R&D
1080? LMAO Wait till you see whats around the corner!
Ever wonder why 1080p TVs are so darn cheap all of a sudden? It's because the industry wants to dump em out! It's almost time for the new spiffy TVs that will make 1080 resolution look like Atari 2600 graphics. That's right. 1,920 x1,080? LMAO. We might be seeing 4,096 x 3,072 TVs. Still not realistic for you? By 2015-2020, we may have 7,680 × 4,320 TVs. Its funny to think a 1080 TV is the same as a 2 megapixel camera. 7,680 is like a 33 megapixel camera. Good show!
So we've had >1080 res monitors for a while, but we are starting to even record stuff higher than 1080.
I started getting pretty excited reading all this stuff. Then I started looking at my 52" 1080 and was like...umm..how the heck can this look any better? I don't sit close enough to it to see any pixels. But damn, with higher resolutions, I'm thinking just how beautiful a 100" TV would look.
Can't wait to setup the home theater with 22.1 surround sound.
The Gaming Thing
i7 3770k @ 4.7GHz
EVGA Z68 FTW
16GBs (4096x4) Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz 8-8-8-24
ENERMAX Galaxy 1000w
EVGA 2x660Ti 3GB Superclocked
Seagate 400GB SATA2
Seagate 1TB SATA3
Samsung DVD-RW DL
Sony 24" 16:10 Widescreen CRT - Gaming goodness
5 case fans
The leaning tower of Puter: MozartTx
DangerDen Goodies: DD-M6 Silver Top, 2x120mm Rad & 2xD5s.
|04-27-2012, 12:19 PM||#2|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Space Between Worlds
Yeah I cant wait for the 4k TVs to come out, just to see what difference they make ... or just to get an "old" 1080p TV cheap LOL
In all reality about the only difference will be how crisp and sharp things look, but for live action stuff there's a limit really. Only with CGI stuff will there be any kind of huge difference between 1080p and 4k
Maybe the way we use a TV is what they are planning to change. Maybe it will be like sci-fi shows where we have some channel playing in a window n the screen whist we browse the web and do other stuff with the rest of the screen !? We're already seeing the change with "smart" TVs bringing basic internet access and access to streaming services.
Intel i5 4690K Devils Canyon
Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3
16Gig G.Skill Trident X Series (2 x 8gig @2133)
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970
256Gig Samsung 850 Pro SSD
1TB Seagate HDD
1TB Samsung HDD
Pioneer Blu-Ray Drive
Corsair HX650 PSU
27" BenQ GW2765HT (2560 x 1440)
24" Hyundai W242D (1920 x 1200)
Steelseries Diablo III Mouse
Logitech Ultra-X Keyboard
BeQuiet! Silent Base 800
|04-30-2012, 09:21 AM||#3|
I need a vacation.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Shit, I don't think it will make a difference for movies... but using a 50" screen on my desktop would be awesome.
My only concern in this is that TVs used live 10-15-20 years. I have a Philco in my bedroom with wood grain paneling from like 89 that still works, and sometimes it's on 10 hours a day. It's survived like 12 moves. I can't bring myself to replace it out of curiosity for how long it can survive.
Sounds like manufacturers realized that they could keep upping resolutions and bring people back to spending thousands on TVs. And maybe that means they'll make TVs that last 5 years. Cheaper parts, more disposable, etc, etc.
I'm not Mr. Green but I'm always sad to see technology go towards the mass-disposable spectrum. It's bad enough with computers and cell phones. But I guess it's not so bad as long as recycling keeps up.
My Blog | My Twitter | DCStats | My Leaderboard | Games List
Cid: (gaming only) (build date: 11/07)
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 ????MHz (@>4100MHz)
Asus P5E3 Premium WiFi (FSB: ???MHz)
2G Corsair XMS3 TW3X2G1600C9DHX 1600MHz (????MHz @ 9-9-9-24)
MSI NX8800 Ultra (720MHz/1580MHz GPU 1250MHz RAM)
Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W Power Supply
Soundblaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio
Swiftech Apogee GTX Cu (CPU)
EK NB/SB-5 (Northbridge)
EK NB/SB Asus 4 (Southbridge)
2x EK Mosfet Asus 3a (Mosfets)
DangerDen 8800GTX Waterblock (GPU)
Laing D4 Pump
Laing D5 Pump
BlackIce Xtreme 2x120mm Radiator
BlackIce Xtreme 120mm Radiator
CPU Full Load Temps: ??c @ ??c Ambient (?.??v Under Load)
3dMark06 16433 | 3dMark05 ??? | SuperPi 1M 15.047s
Currently Playing: WoW WoTLK, Fallout3
|04-30-2012, 10:55 AM||#4|
Super Cow Powers
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near the sinking ship, and free motorbikes.
4K will be great on massive TVs.. But is 1080 even needed on the 32" sized TVs? So would going from 1080 > 4k actually make any difference?
I'd imagine most home users would still go for a 32-46" TV, where 1080 is perfectly adequate and 4k would provide little improvement due to the size of the screen. So it could just be a great marketing gimmick to get people to replace perfectly good 1080 TVs with 4K TVs in situations where they aren't actually needed.
That's not even going down the route that most people wont want to bin their 3 year old TVs that still work, and also that we don't really have any mainstream media that can deliver that resolution either.
It could be awesome for cinemas etc, but at the moment, I genuinely think its too much for home usage, other than being a fantastic bit of marketing.
Gaming: 2500K @ 4.5Ghz, 12Gb Mushkin DDR3, Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H, GTX460, 1Tb RAID0 (OS) + 5Tb (Files), Silverstone DA850 PSU (850W), Antec 300, Win7 Pro.
General Stuff System: Intel C2D @ 3.7Ghz (1.6Ghz Stock), 1Gb Ram, 7600GS-250Gb HD, WinXP Pro
Laptop 1: C2D T5450, 2Gb Ram, 160Gb HD, GeForce 7300, Vista Home Premium
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|top right corner of page||Cabal||Liquid Chat||11||08-18-2007 03:49 PM|
|Just wait till 16.1 Surround Sound hits PCs||Flybye||Audio & Video||32||10-06-2004 03:25 PM|